Non‑Performant Software and the Incentives That Sustain It
The article examines why software that performs poorly remains in use. It identifies economic incentives that reward low‑efficiency code. The author discusses how short‑term
The article examines why software that performs poorly remains in use. It identifies
economic incentives that reward low‑efficiency code. The author discusses how short‑term
cost savings can outweigh long‑term performance gains. The piece notes that maintenance
contracts often favor existing, suboptimal solutions. It points out that developers may
lack motivation to refactor inefficient code. The article highlights market pressures that
discourage performance improvements. It suggests that changing incentive structures could
promote more efficient software. The author calls for industry stakeholders to reassess
value metrics.