National Review Examines Double Standard of Guilt by Association

The piece analyzes how guilt by association is applied unevenly. It argues that some groups face harsher judgments than others. The author highlights examples of selective condemnation. The discussion points to political bias influencing perceptions. Critics claim the standard undermines fair debate. The article calls for consistent standards across cases. It suggests that media narratives reinforce the double standard. Readers are urged to scrutinize accusations more critically.