Debate over cleanup responsibility after 'vibe‑coding' sessions

The article examines informal coding gatherings dubbed 'vibe‑coding' parties. Such events prioritize rapid prototyping and collaborative energy. Participants often leave code in a rough state. The piece raises the question of who should tidy the resulting code. It discusses potential roles for organizers, contributors, and reviewers. Concerns include technical debt and maintainability. The discussion highlights the need for post‑event cleanup processes. Readers are encouraged to consider policies for future sessions.